United States v. Advanced Technology Construction, C19-1013RSM. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190912d87
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY PENDING MANDATORY ARBITRATION RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Mandatory Arbitration. Dkt. #56. Defendants argue that a stay is required to comply with certain contract provisions requiring binding arbitration for disputes between Plaintiff and Defendant Advanced Technology Construction. Id . The Court agrees after reviewing those provisions and the cases cited by Defendants.
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY PENDING MANDATORY ARBITRATION RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Mandatory Arbitration. Dkt. #56. Defendants argue that a stay is required to comply with certain contract provisions requiring binding arbitration for disputes between Plaintiff and Defendant Advanced Technology Construction. Id . The Court agrees after reviewing those provisions and the cases cited by Defendants. P..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY PENDING MANDATORY ARBITRATION
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Mandatory Arbitration. Dkt. #56. Defendants argue that a stay is required to comply with certain contract provisions requiring binding arbitration for disputes between Plaintiff and Defendant Advanced Technology Construction. Id. The Court agrees after reviewing those provisions and the cases cited by Defendants. Plaintiff has not filed any brief in opposition. This failure is considered by the Court as an admission that this Motion has merit. See LCR 7(b)(2).
Accordingly, having considered Defendants' Motion and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS:
1) Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Mandatory Arbitration, Dkt. #56, is GRANTED.
2) These proceedings shall be STAYED pending resolution of the merits of the underlying dispute between AMP Electric and Advanced Technology Construction through arbitration pursuant to those parties' Subcontract.
3) The parties are to provide a joint status report to the Court no later than 10 days after such resolution, or within 180 days of this Order if no resolution is reached.
Source: Leagle
