DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES, INC. v. PHARMA SUPPLY, INC., 3:08-cv-00149-MOC-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120409359
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. Pursuant to the stipulation of voluntary dismissal filed by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Diagnostic Devices, Inc ("DDI"), Defendant/Counterclaimant TaiDoc Technology Corporation ("TaiDoc"), and Counterclaim Defendants Richard Admani ("Admani"), Ramzi Abulhaj ("Abulhaj") and Prodigy Diabetes Care, LLC ("Prodigy") and for good cause shown, the Court hereby enters the following Order: It is hereby ordered that all claims brought in this action by or
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. Pursuant to the stipulation of voluntary dismissal filed by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Diagnostic Devices, Inc ("DDI"), Defendant/Counterclaimant TaiDoc Technology Corporation ("TaiDoc"), and Counterclaim Defendants Richard Admani ("Admani"), Ramzi Abulhaj ("Abulhaj") and Prodigy Diabetes Care, LLC ("Prodigy") and for good cause shown, the Court hereby enters the following Order: It is hereby ordered that all claims brought in this action by or ..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to the stipulation of voluntary dismissal filed by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Diagnostic Devices, Inc ("DDI"), Defendant/Counterclaimant TaiDoc Technology Corporation ("TaiDoc"), and Counterclaim Defendants Richard Admani ("Admani"), Ramzi Abulhaj ("Abulhaj") and Prodigy Diabetes Care, LLC ("Prodigy") and for good cause shown, the Court hereby enters the following Order:
It is hereby ordered that all claims brought in this action by or between DDI, TaiDoc, Admani, Abulhaj and Prodigy are dismissed, with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own fees and costs associated therewith. All pending motions relating to the claims dismissed hereby are moot.
Source: Leagle
