CHAPMAN v. WATERBIRD NAVIGATION, S.A., 3:16-cv-04887-MEJ. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160902a74
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT Plaintiff Captain David Chapman and Defendant General Steamship Agencies, Inc., the only parties having appeared to date in this action, hereby agree and stipulate that this case is to be remanded to state court, without prejudice to the rights of any party. The grounds for remand are that plaintiff has agreed to dismiss General Steamship Age
Summary: STIPULATION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT Plaintiff Captain David Chapman and Defendant General Steamship Agencies, Inc., the only parties having appeared to date in this action, hereby agree and stipulate that this case is to be remanded to state court, without prejudice to the rights of any party. The grounds for remand are that plaintiff has agreed to dismiss General Steamship Agen..
More
STIPULATION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT
Plaintiff Captain David Chapman and Defendant General Steamship Agencies, Inc., the only parties having appeared to date in this action, hereby agree and stipulate that this case is to be remanded to state court, without prejudice to the rights of any party.
The grounds for remand are that plaintiff has agreed to dismiss General Steamship Agencies, Inc. (and another defendant, Transmarine Navigation Corporation) and has authorized the filing of a dismissal of those parties upon remand. Based thereon, GSA no longer has a practical interest in whether this action proceeds in state or federal court, and has therefore agreed to remand, accordingly.
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle