Hayes v. Autotex MGA, Inc., 2:18-cv-01938-GMN-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190312c09
Visitors: 32
Filed: Mar. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2019
Summary: Order [Docket No. 47] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Autotex filed a notice of intent to serve a subpoena. Docket No. 47. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above referenced-document, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court o
Summary: Order [Docket No. 47] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Autotex filed a notice of intent to serve a subpoena. Docket No. 47. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above referenced-document, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court or..
More
Order [Docket No. 47]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Autotex filed a notice of intent to serve a subpoena. Docket No. 47. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above referenced-document, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
