Michelucci v. County of Napa, 4:18-cv-05144-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181101996
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DANTE MICHELUCCI ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant COUNTY OF NAPA ("Defendant Napa") (collectively, the "Parties") that the dates set forth in the Court's September 6, 2018 Notice Setting Case Management Conference for Reassigned Civil Case be continued. The Parties stipulate and request the continuance because Pla
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DANTE MICHELUCCI ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant COUNTY OF NAPA ("Defendant Napa") (collectively, the "Parties") that the dates set forth in the Court's September 6, 2018 Notice Setting Case Management Conference for Reassigned Civil Case be continued. The Parties stipulate and request the continuance because Plai..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DANTE MICHELUCCI ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant COUNTY OF NAPA ("Defendant Napa") (collectively, the "Parties") that the dates set forth in the Court's September 6, 2018 Notice Setting Case Management Conference for Reassigned Civil Case be continued. The Parties stipulate and request the continuance because Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on October 23, 2018, and Defendant Napa intends to file a Rule 12 motion by November 6, 2018, which will not be heard prior to the presently scheduled November 20, 2018 Case Management Conference.
The Parties agree that they would mutually benefit by continuing the Initial Case Management Conference (November 20, 2018), the related Rule 26(f) and ADR obligations and filings, and the Joint Case Management Conference Statement, until a reasonable time after the Court's decision on Defendant Napa's Rule 12 motion.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
