Hittle v. City of Stockton, 2-12-CV-00766-TLN-KJN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180426961
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), thus requiring defendants to file a responsive pleading within fourteen days; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants' time to respond to the SAC shall be extended seven (7) days; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: Pursuant to Rule 6-144 and Rule 83-143 of the Local Rules of
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), thus requiring defendants to file a responsive pleading within fourteen days; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants' time to respond to the SAC shall be extended seven (7) days; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: Pursuant to Rule 6-144 and Rule 83-143 of the Local Rules of ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), thus requiring defendants to file a responsive pleading within fourteen days;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants' time to respond to the SAC shall be extended seven (7) days;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
Pursuant to Rule 6-144 and Rule 83-143 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, the parties hereby stipulate to a one-week extension of time for defendants to file a response to the SAC. Defendants' responsive pleading is now due to be filed on May 3, 2018.
I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence for the filing of this document for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
