Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Estate of Rushing v. AG Private Protection, Inc., 2:18-cv-01692-MCE-AC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191205880 Visitors: 34
Filed: Dec. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE RE: OPPOSITION TO CITY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Estate of Tyler S. Rushing, Scott K. Rushing, and Paula L. Rushing's request for page limit increase concerning their forthcoming opposition to Defendants City of Chico, Chico Police Department, Scott Ruppel, Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and Jeremy Gagnebin's motion for summary
More

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PAGE LIMIT INCREASE RE: OPPOSITION TO CITY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Estate of Tyler S. Rushing, Scott K. Rushing, and Paula L. Rushing's request for page limit increase concerning their forthcoming opposition to Defendants City of Chico, Chico Police Department, Scott Ruppel, Cedric Schwyzer, Alex Fliehr, and Jeremy Gagnebin's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 37). Plaintiffs' opposition brief shall receive a ten (10) page limit increase, in addition to the regularly-afforded twenty (20) pages, for a total of thirty (30) pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer