City and County of San Francisco v. Whitaker, 18-cv-02068-JST. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190221b60
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Re: ECF No. 42 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . On December 10, 2018, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, concluding that Plaintiff had failed to demonstrate Article III standing. ECF No. 42. The Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiff's claims but permitted Plaintiff to "file an amended complaint within 30 days." Id. at 23. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with preju
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE Re: ECF No. 42 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . On December 10, 2018, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, concluding that Plaintiff had failed to demonstrate Article III standing. ECF No. 42. The Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiff's claims but permitted Plaintiff to "file an amended complaint within 30 days." Id. at 23. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejud..
More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Re: ECF No. 42
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
On December 10, 2018, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, concluding that Plaintiff had failed to demonstrate Article III standing. ECF No. 42. The Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiff's claims but permitted Plaintiff to "file an amended complaint within 30 days." Id. at 23. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
