23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA, LLC, 18-cv-02791-EMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180910677
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE Docket No. 56. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff's administrative motion is the kind of motion that should have been resolved by the parties without the need for any judicial intervention. The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court's calendar cannot accommodate an advancement in the hearing date on Plaintiff's motion for entry of judgment and to stay. Thus, th
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE Docket No. 56. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff's administrative motion is the kind of motion that should have been resolved by the parties without the need for any judicial intervention. The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court's calendar cannot accommodate an advancement in the hearing date on Plaintiff's motion for entry of judgment and to stay. Thus, the..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADVANCE HEARING DATE
Docket No. 56.
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff's administrative motion is the kind of motion that should have been resolved by the parties without the need for any judicial intervention. The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court's calendar cannot accommodate an advancement in the hearing date on Plaintiff's motion for entry of judgment and to stay. Thus, the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for entry of judgment and to stay shall remain the same (i.e., November 15, 2018). However, the Court temporarily VACATES the initial case management conference and will reschedule the conference, if necessary, after the motion for entry of judgment and to stay is resolved. Similarly, the Court VACATES the deadline by which Plaintiff must file its amended complaint. A new deadline shall be imposed, if necessary, after the motion for entry of judgment and to stay is resolved.
The Court notes that, although it is setting a hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for entry of judgment and to stay, it reserves the right to decide the motion, either in whole or in part, on the papers.
This order disposes of Docket No. 56.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
