Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TERRY v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 3:15-cv-01483-WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160504a25 Visitors: 42
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiffs NATHAN TERRY and GERALDINE TERRY ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and U.S. BANK, N.A. ("Defendants"), through their counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows: RECITALS 1. WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, or in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement (Docket No. 21)
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs NATHAN TERRY and GERALDINE TERRY ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and U.S. BANK, N.A. ("Defendants"), through their counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

RECITALS

1. WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, or in the Alternative, For a More Definite Statement (Docket No. 21);

2. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs need one additional day to file their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint;

3. WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to extend Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint by one day from May 2, 2016 to May 3, 2016;

4. WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to extend Defendants' deadline to file the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint by one day from May 9, 2016 to May 10, 2016;

5. WHEREAS, this stipulation waives no rights of either Party;

6. WHEREAS, no other extension has previously been stipulated to, requested, or granted.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended by one day from May 2, 2016 to May 3, 2016; and 2. The deadline for Defendants to file the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended by one day from May 9, 2016 to May 10, 2016.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT

Having reviewed the above stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefore, It IS SO ORDERED.

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended by one day from May 2, 2016 to May 3, 2016; and 2. The deadline for Defendants to file the Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended by one day from May 9, 2016 to May 10, 2016.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer