Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Piergallini, 5:14-CV-00814-RMW. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141209727 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND () ORDER [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii) and (2)] RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiff RICHARD JOHNSON and Defendants Mario A. Piergallini, an individual and Karen L. Piergallini, an individual, collectively d/b/a/BLOSSOM VALLEY VALERO by and through their attorneys of record, file this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) and (2). Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on February 22, 201
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND () ORDER [F.R.C.P.§§ 41(a)(1)(ii) and (2)]

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Plaintiff RICHARD JOHNSON and Defendants Mario A. Piergallini, an individual and Karen L. Piergallini, an individual, collectively d/b/a/BLOSSOM VALLEY VALERO by and through their attorneys of record, file this Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure §§ 41(a)(1)(ii) and (2). Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on February 22, 2014. Defendants, who have answered the complaint, agree to the dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendants further stipulate that each side shall pay its own attorneys' fees and costs.

This case is not a class action, and no receiver has been appointed.

Wherefore, Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, so stipulate.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. The lawsuit against Defendants is dismissed with prejudice.

2. Each side shall pay its own attorneys' fees and costs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer