Pollard v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-01788-KJN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180712735
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 6, 2018, to July 20, 2018. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel needs ad
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 6, 2018, to July 20, 2018. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel needs add..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 6, 2018, to July 20, 2018. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel needs additional time for agency review and to explore potential settlement of the case. Counsel also has over 85+ pending social security cases, which require two or more dispositive motions a week until mid-August. Due to current workload demands and unexpected leave, Counsel became behind on her heavy caseload and needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
