Cooley v. Freedom Forever LLC, : 2:19-cv-00562-JCM-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190806d03
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2019
Summary: Order [Docket No. 38] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to complete service of process on the John Doe party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Docket No. 38. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 provides, (m) Time Limit for Service. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice agains
Summary: Order [Docket No. 38] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to complete service of process on the John Doe party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Docket No. 38. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 provides, (m) Time Limit for Service. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against..
More
Order
[Docket No. 38]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to extend time to complete service of process on the John Doe party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Docket No. 38.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 provides,
(m) Time Limit for Service. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. This subdivision (m) does not apply to service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f), 4(h)(2), or 4(j)(1); or to service of a notice under Rule 71.1(d)(3)(A).
The Court's discretion to extend time for service is broad. In re Sheehan, 253 F.3d 507, 513 (9th Cir. 2001). For good cause shown, Plaintiff's motion to extend time under Rule 4(m), Docket No. 38, is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall complete service of process upon the John Doe party no later than October 4, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
