Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Anniversary Mining Claims, LLC v. Clark County, 2:19-CV-00458-JCM-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190712d31 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6), OR AN ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S DEMANDS IN PRAYER FOR RELIEF FRCP 12(f) (FIRST REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, Anniversary Mining Claims, LLC (hereinafter "Anniversary Mining"), by and through its counsel of record, Matthew Q. Callister, Esq. and Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq. with the Callister Law G
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6), OR AN ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S DEMANDS IN PRAYER FOR RELIEF FRCP 12(f)

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff, Anniversary Mining Claims, LLC (hereinafter "Anniversary Mining"), by and through its counsel of record, Matthew Q. Callister, Esq. and Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq. with the Callister Law Group, and Defendant, Clark County, by and through its counsel of record, Agnes Hanley, Esq. and Chris Hanley, Esq. with the Hanley Law Firm, hereby submits this Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Opposition to Defendant Clark County's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), or an Alternative Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Demands in Prayer for Relief FRCP 12(f) (hereinafter "Motion to Dismiss") which was filed on June 25, 2019. The parties have agreed to enter into this Stipulation as Plaintiff's counsel was out of town the entire week of July 1, 2019 and given the complexity of the issues alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint, was unable to complete the Opposition by the date set forth by this Court.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiff, Anniversary Mining Claims, LLC, shall have until July 17, 2019 to file its Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 19.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Defendant, Clark County, shall serve its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss within seven (7) days of the filing of Plaintiff's Opposition unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated this 9th day of July 2019. Dated this 9th day of July 2019. CALLISTER LAW GROUP HANLEY LAW FIRM /s/ Mitchell S. Bisson /s/ Agnes N. Hanley Matthew Q. Callister, Esq. Agnes N.p Hanley, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 1396 Nevada Bar No. 11226 Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq. Chris M. Hanley, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 011920 Nevada Bar No. 11391 330 E. Charleston Blvd., Suite 100 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 800 Las Vegas, NV 89104 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant

IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer