Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MAY v. MAPLES, 1:13CV00113 JM. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20141202861 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed by De
More

ORDER

JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Alfredo Ant'e, Paul Burnside, Chad Davis, Calvin Ford, Antonio Garcia, John Maples, Jr., and Trevor Stevenson (docket entry #56) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED.

2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to his claims against Defendants Ant'e, Burnside, Davis, Ford, Garcia, Maples, Stevenson, and Jeffrey Rizer, and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects.

3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer