Williams v. Esurance, 2:18-cv-01168-APG-BNW. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20191106e36
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 25] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendants Esurance, Allstate Insurance Company, Xaeng Vongvixay, and Douangmala Vongvixay move to dismiss the complaint for failure to timely effect service. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff Gerald Williams did not respond. See LR 7-2(d). Additionally, Williams' affidavit of service does not show timely proper service was made as to any defendant. I therefore grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. IT IS T
Summary: Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 25] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendants Esurance, Allstate Insurance Company, Xaeng Vongvixay, and Douangmala Vongvixay move to dismiss the complaint for failure to timely effect service. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff Gerald Williams did not respond. See LR 7-2(d). Additionally, Williams' affidavit of service does not show timely proper service was made as to any defendant. I therefore grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. IT IS TH..
More
Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 25]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Defendants Esurance, Allstate Insurance Company, Xaeng Vongvixay, and Douangmala Vongvixay move to dismiss the complaint for failure to timely effect service. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff Gerald Williams did not respond. See LR 7-2(d). Additionally, Williams' affidavit of service does not show timely proper service was made as to any defendant. I therefore grant the defendants' motion to dismiss.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Gerald Williams' complaint (ECF No. 16) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely and properly effect service as to any defendant. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.
Source: Leagle
