Brady v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:19-cv-01116-KJM-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191030n10
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who was formerly proceeding in this social security matter in pro se, has retained counsel. ECF No. 13. On October 22, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute because plaintiff failed to timely file her consent or decline form for magistrate judge jurisdiction. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff subsequently filed the form, ECF No. 12, and objections to the findings and recommendat
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who was formerly proceeding in this social security matter in pro se, has retained counsel. ECF No. 13. On October 22, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute because plaintiff failed to timely file her consent or decline form for magistrate judge jurisdiction. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff subsequently filed the form, ECF No. 12, and objections to the findings and recommendati..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who was formerly proceeding in this social security matter in pro se, has retained counsel. ECF No. 13. On October 22, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute because plaintiff failed to timely file her consent or decline form for magistrate judge jurisdiction. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff subsequently filed the form, ECF No. 12, and objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 13.
For good cause shown, the findings and recommendations at ECF No. 10 are hereby VACATED. Further, because all parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction (ECF Nos. 4, 12), the clerk of court is DIRECTED to remove the district judge from this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle