Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Envista, LLC v. Audintel, Inc., 4:16-cv-06765-HSG. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170816c01 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on May 11, 2017, Defendant Raghvendra Sinha filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or improper venue that is currently set to be heard by this Court on August 17, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 44); WHEREAS, on May 25, 2017, Plaintiffs' Envista, LLC and Envista Concepts, LLC filed their Opp
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE

WHEREAS, on May 11, 2017, Defendant Raghvendra Sinha filed a Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or improper venue that is currently set to be heard by this Court on August 17, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 44);

WHEREAS, on May 25, 2017, Plaintiffs' Envista, LLC and Envista Concepts, LLC filed their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 45);

WHEREAS, on June 1, 2017, Defendant Raghvendra Sinha filed their Reply to the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 46); and

WHEREAS, the parties wish to have the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss continued to a later date, as the parties are in the process of attempting to negotiate a settlement to resolve this matter;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(b)(1), ask the Court to order that the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to September 28, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this electronically filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer