Williams v. Saul, EDCV 18-2011-E. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190820615
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) CHARLES F. EICK , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, IT IS ORDERED that fees in the amount of THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED and TWENTY-NINE Dollars and 60cents [$3,729.60] as authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation FootNotes 1. Initially, Plaintiff commenced t
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) CHARLES F. EICK , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, IT IS ORDERED that fees in the amount of THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED and TWENTY-NINE Dollars and 60cents [$3,729.60] as authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation FootNotes 1. Initially, Plaintiff commenced th..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
CHARLES F. EICK, Magistrate Judge.
Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, IT IS ORDERED that fees in the amount of THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED and TWENTY-NINE Dollars and 60cents [$3,729.60] as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation
FootNotes
1. Initially, Plaintiff commenced this action against Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. On June 4, 2019, Andrew M. Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, replacing Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew M. Saul should be substituted, therefore, for Acting Nancy A. Berryhill as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
