Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Flores, 1:18-cv-01248-LJO-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191108c95 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER CLOSING THE CASE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, and Defendants Arturo Flores and Alejandro Vasquez that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice against Arturo Flores and Alejandro Vasquez. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by February 1, 2020, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudic
More

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC, and Defendants Arturo Flores and Alejandro Vasquez that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice against Arturo Flores and Alejandro Vasquez.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by February 1, 2020, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice.

This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

ORDER

Because the parties have stipulated to close this action, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer