Watts v. Department of Corrections, 2:17-cv-0852 JAM DB P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190403c83
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 18, 2019, this action was referred to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed for 120 days. (ECF No. 29.) On March 25, 2019, a settlement conference was held in this action. (ECF No. 37.) The case did not settle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The stay in this action is lifted; and 2. Within thirty day
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 18, 2019, this action was referred to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed for 120 days. (ECF No. 29.) On March 25, 2019, a settlement conference was held in this action. (ECF No. 37.) The case did not settle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The stay in this action is lifted; and 2. Within thirty days..
More
ORDER
DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 18, 2019, this action was referred to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed for 120 days. (ECF No. 29.) On March 25, 2019, a settlement conference was held in this action. (ECF No. 37.) The case did not settle.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The stay in this action is lifted; and
2. Within thirty days of the date of this order defendants shall file a responsive pleading.
Source: Leagle
