Filed: Aug. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Mr. Corwin Brown filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 pursuant to Johnson v. United States, on June 22, 2016. Mr. Brown wishes to accelerate the disposition because if his motion prevails he could receive a new sentence of time served. The government does not object to an accelerated schedule. The Court issued an order on August 8, 2016, requiring the government to ans
Summary: STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Mr. Corwin Brown filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 pursuant to Johnson v. United States, on June 22, 2016. Mr. Brown wishes to accelerate the disposition because if his motion prevails he could receive a new sentence of time served. The government does not object to an accelerated schedule. The Court issued an order on August 8, 2016, requiring the government to answ..
More
STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Mr. Corwin Brown filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255 pursuant to Johnson v. United States, on June 22, 2016. Mr. Brown wishes to accelerate the disposition because if his motion prevails he could receive a new sentence of time served. The government does not object to an accelerated schedule.
The Court issued an order on August 8, 2016, requiring the government to answer within 60 days, and for the movant to file a traverse, if any, within 30 days.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting United States, through Ross Naughton, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Respondent, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender, Lexi P. Negin, attorney for Movant Corwin Brown, hereby stipulate and agree that the briefing schedule be set as follows:
Government Opposition due: September 22, 2016
Defense Reply due: October 6, 2016
ORDER
The Court orders that the proposed briefing schedule is adopted.
