Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MELLOR, 2:16-CR-068 TLN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161130776 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Ross K. Naughton, and Defendant Brian Mellor by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on December 1, 2016. The government previously provided defense counsel with discovery
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Ross K. Naughton, and Defendant Brian Mellor by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows:

1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on December 1, 2016. The government previously provided defense counsel with discovery in the form of reports of investigation, text messages, photographs and other materials related to the government's investigation of this matter. 2. The defense is presently conducting investigation and legal research into matters relevant to exploration of potential defenses. Defense counsel requires additional time to complete these matters and discuss them with Defendant. The defense is therefore requesting to continue the status conference to January 26, 2017. 3. Counsel for Defendant believes that failure to grant additional time as requested would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 4. Based on the above-stated facts, the parties jointly request that the Court find that the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a trial within the time prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. 5. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of December 1, 2016 to January 26, 2017, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), and (B) (iv) [Local Code T-4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at Defendant's request on the basis that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. 6. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ross Naughton has reviewed this proposed order and authorized Todd Leras to sign it on his behalf.

ORDER

BASED ON THE REPRESENTATIONS AND STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, it is hereby ordered that the status conference in this matter scheduled for December 1, 2016, is vacated. A new status conference is scheduled for December 1, for January 26, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. The Court further finds, based on the representations of the parties and Defendant's request, that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow necessary attorney preparation taking into consideration the exercise of due diligence for the period from December 1, 2016, up to and including January 26, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer