Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bryant v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, 2:19-cv-01743-TLN-CKD. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191107a63 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby approves the Stipulated Protective Order filed jointly by the parties on November 1, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED, with the following amendments and clarifications: 1. The parties shall comply with the provisions and procedures of Local Rules 140 and 141 with respect to sealing or redaction requests. To the extent that the parties' stipulation conflicts with
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby approves the Stipulated Protective Order filed jointly by the parties on November 1, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED, with the following amendments and clarifications:

1. The parties shall comply with the provisions and procedures of Local Rules 140 and 141 with respect to sealing or redaction requests. To the extent that the parties' stipulation conflicts with the Local Rules, the Local Rules shall govern.

2. Prior to filing any motion related to this stipulated protective order or other discovery motion, the parties shall first exhaust informal meet-and-confer efforts and otherwise comply with Local Rule 251.

3. Nothing in this order limits the testimony of parties or non-parties, or the use of certain documents, at any court hearing or trial—such determinations will only be made by the court at the hearing or trial, or upon an appropriate motion.

4. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(f), the court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of this stipulated protective order after the action is terminated.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer