HOBART CORPORATION v. THE DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, 3:13-cv-115. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20170515689
Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: AMENDED ORDER (To Correct Doc. #) WALTER HERBERT RICE , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's March 1, 2017 Notation Order sustaining Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint [Doc. #642], it is hereby ORDERED THAT: The Sixth Amended Complaint and the Fifth Amended Complaint are identical with respect to the defendants named in the Fifth Amended Complaint, and those defendants may not file a motion to dismiss or Answer with respect to the Sixth Amended Compl
Summary: AMENDED ORDER (To Correct Doc. #) WALTER HERBERT RICE , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's March 1, 2017 Notation Order sustaining Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint [Doc. #642], it is hereby ORDERED THAT: The Sixth Amended Complaint and the Fifth Amended Complaint are identical with respect to the defendants named in the Fifth Amended Complaint, and those defendants may not file a motion to dismiss or Answer with respect to the Sixth Amended Compla..
More
AMENDED ORDER (To Correct Doc. #)
WALTER HERBERT RICE, District Judge.
In accordance with the Court's March 1, 2017 Notation Order sustaining Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint [Doc. #642], it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
The Sixth Amended Complaint and the Fifth Amended Complaint are identical with respect to the defendants named in the Fifth Amended Complaint, and those defendants may not file a motion to dismiss or Answer with respect to the Sixth Amended Complaint. Defendants' Answers to the Fifth Amended Complaint shall be deemed the Answers to the Sixth Amended Complaint.
Source: Leagle
