Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Monsibias v. City of Bakersfield, 1:18-CV-01390-DAD-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190415d47 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (DOC. 16) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the above-referenced matter be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Dated: April 11, 2019. MARDEROSIAN & COHEN /s/Michael G. Marderosian By:______________________________
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION

(DOC. 16)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the above-referenced matter be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

Dated: April 11, 2019. MARDEROSIAN & COHEN /s/Michael G. Marderosian By:___________________________________ Michael G. Marderosian, Attorneys for Defendants above-named. Dated: April 11, 2019. RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES /s/Danay Gonzalez By:________________________________ Danay Gonzalez, Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 16) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 22), it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer