Lak v. California, SACV 18-160-PSG (KK). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180914d02
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED t
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED th..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing Plaintiff's federal law claims with prejudice and Plaintiff's state law claims without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
