HUPP v. CITY OF BEAUMONT, ED CV 14-1303-VAP (SP). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160909m06
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Solera defendants' motion for attorney's fees, plaintiffs' application to strike the motion and for sanctions, the other pertinent records in this case, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Solera defendants' motion for attorney's fees, plaintiffs' application to strike the motion and for sanctions, the other pertinent records in this case, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The C..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Solera defendants' motion for attorney's fees, plaintiffs' application to strike the motion and for sanctions, the other pertinent records in this case, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Solera defendants' motion for attorney's fees (docket no. 76) and plaintiffs' application to strike the motion and for sanctions (docket no. 77) are denied.
Source: Leagle
