Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Trevino v. City of Bakersfield, 1:14-CV-01873-JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160622805 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING EVIDENCE; [ PROPOSED ] ORDER THEREON (Doc. 45) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to this Court's Pretrial Conference Order, the parties met and conferred on June 17, 2016, regarding anticipated motions in limine. Pursuant to that conference, it was agreed that: 1. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument regarding economic damages including, but not limited to, medical expenses, both past and future, and wage loss, both past
More

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING EVIDENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

(Doc. 45)

Pursuant to this Court's Pretrial Conference Order, the parties met and conferred on June 17, 2016, regarding anticipated motions in limine. Pursuant to that conference, it was agreed that:

1. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument regarding economic damages including, but not limited to, medical expenses, both past and future, and wage loss, both past and future.

2. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument regarding the Plaintiff's DUI.

3. Donald R. Huene, M.D., will not testify regarding his impressions of, or otherwise comment on, Plaintiff's psychiatric condition and/or Plaintiff's ability or inability to hear.

4. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument that a verdict in favor of the Plaintiff would come from tax payer dollars.

5. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument regarding the "golden rule".

In regard to the above referenced areas, the parties agree:

1. Not to mention, refer to, or attempt to convey to the jury in any manner, either directly or indirectly, any of the facts mentioned in the above referenced area; and

2. Warn and caution each witness to strictly follow said instructions.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that at the time of trial:

1. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument regarding economic damages including, but not limited to, medical expenses, both past and future, and wage loss, both past and future.

2. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument regarding the Plaintiff's DUI.

3. Donald R. Huene, M.D., will not testify regarding his impressions of, or otherwise comment on, Plaintiff's psychiatric condition and/or Plaintiff's ability or inability to hear.

4. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument that a verdict in favor of the Plaintiff would come from tax payer dollars.

5. There will be no reference to, evidence of, or argument regarding the "golden rule".

In regard to the above referenced areas, the parties shall:

1. Not mention, refer to, or attempt to convey to the jury in any manner, either directly or indirectly, any of the facts mentioned in the above referenced area; and

2. Warn and caution each witness to strictly follow said instructions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer