Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pederson v. NCR Corporation, 16-cv-06185-WHO. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171017739 Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 40 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 40

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement.

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer