U.S. v. WOOLDRIDGE, 4:97-cr-40013. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151216964
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER HARRY F. BARNES , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 28, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 101. Judge Ford recommends that Defendant/Movant Wooldridge's motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence be denied. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(
Summary: ORDER HARRY F. BARNES , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 28, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 101. Judge Ford recommends that Defendant/Movant Wooldridge's motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence be denied. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1..
More
ORDER
HARRY F. BARNES, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 28, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 101. Judge Ford recommends that Defendant/Movant Wooldridge's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence be denied. No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Defendant/Movant Wooldridge's motion (ECF No. 95) is DENIED and his claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
