Young America's Foundation v. Napolitano, 3:17-cv-02255-MMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180124a26
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINSITRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Having considered the parties' submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Defendants' administrative motion to enlarge the page limit for their reply in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Because the opening and opposition briefs were both 30 pages long, permitting Defendants to file a reply brief of 18 pages w
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINSITRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Having considered the parties' submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Defendants' administrative motion to enlarge the page limit for their reply in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Because the opening and opposition briefs were both 30 pages long, permitting Defendants to file a reply brief of 18 pages wo..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINSITRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Having considered the parties' submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Defendants' administrative motion to enlarge the page limit for their reply in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Because the opening and opposition briefs were both 30 pages long, permitting Defendants to file a reply brief of 18 pages would maintain the standard ratio between the length of the opposition (usually 25 pages) and the length of the reply (usually 15 pages). Accordingly, Defendants may file a reply brief of no more than 18 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
