Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, C-12-05556-RS (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130124a36 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS' CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, three related shareholder derivative actions 1 against certain of the officers and directors of OCZ Technology Group, Inc. ("OCZ" or the "Company") were filed in this Court; WHEREAS, on January 14, 2013, the Court entered an order consolidating the Related Actions, appointing Co-Lead Counsel, and setting a deadline of J
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS' CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, three related shareholder derivative actions1 against certain of the officers and directors of OCZ Technology Group, Inc. ("OCZ" or the "Company") were filed in this Court;

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2013, the Court entered an order consolidating the Related Actions, appointing Co-Lead Counsel, and setting a deadline of January 25, 2013, for plaintiffs to file a consolidated complaint;

WHEREAS, the initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") in the Cassiman and Vanderschaaf actions are set for February 7, 2013, and the initial CMC in the Morton Action is set for March 21, 2013;

WHEREAS, OCZ has announced that it intends to restate its financial results for certain fiscal periods;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs have requested that the deadline to file the consolidated complaint be extended until after OCZ files its restated financial results with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and defendants have agreed to plaintiffs' request; and

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding the upcoming CMCs and the related ADR and CMC deadlines and agree that, given the current procedural posture, and in particular, the fact that the operative complaint has not yet been filed, the CMC and related CMC and ADR deadlines should be extended as set forth below.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to Court approval, by plaintiffs and defendants, through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

1. The CMCs scheduled for February 7, 2013, and March 21, 2013, and the related CMC and ADR deadlines, are vacated. The initial CMC for this consolidated derivative action will be rescheduled to occur on the same date and time as the hearing on defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, as discussed below.

2. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the initial CMC.

3. Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Complaint ("Consolidated Complaint") within 21 days after the Company files with the SEC its financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2013, as well as the results for the fiscal year 2012, including any and all restatements, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the Court.

4. Defendants shall respond to the Consolidated Complaint within forty-five days after service, unless otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by the Court. In the event that defendants file any motions directed at the Consolidated Complaint, the opposition and reply briefs shall be filed within forty-five and twenty-one days, respectively, of the motions, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the Court. The parties agree to confer to select a hearing date for any such motions.

Dated: January 23, 2013 ROBBINS ARROYO LLP BRIAN J. ROBBINS GEORGE C. AGUILAR LAUREN N. OCHENDUSZKO s/ George C. Aguilar GEORGE C. AGUILAR 600 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 525-3990 Facsimile: (619) 525-3991 brobbins@robbinsarroyo.com gaguilar@robbinsarroyo.com lochenduszko@robbinsarroyo.com ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP TRAVIS E. DOWNS III BENNY C. GOODMAN III ERIK W. LUEDEKE 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 231-1058 Facsimile: (619) 231-7423 travisd@rgrdlaw.com bennyg@rgrdlaw.com eluedeke@rgrdlaw.com ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 288-4545 Facsimile: (415) 288-4534 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs Dated: January 23, 2013 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI BORIS FELDMAN DIANE WALTERS s/ Diane Walters DIANE WALTERS 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 boris.feldman@wsgr.com dwalters@wsgr.com Counsel for Defendants Ralph H. Schmitt, Adam J. Epstein, Richard L. Hunter, Russell J. Knittel, and Nominal Defendant OCZ Technology Group, Inc. Dated: January 23, 2013 HOGAN LOVELLS LLP s/ Norman J. Blears NORMAN J. BLEARS 525 University Avenue 4th Floor Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 463-4000 Facsimile: (650) 463-4199 Norman.blears@hoganlovells.com Counsel for Defendant Arthur F. Knapp, Jr.

I, George C. Aguilar, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference and Extending Deadline for Plaintiffs' Consolidated Complaint. In compliance with General Order No. 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Diane Walters and Norman J. Blears have concurred in this filing.

s/ George C. Aguilar GEORGE C. AGUILAR

* * *

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The related actions are: (i) Cassiman v. Petersen, et al., No. C-12-05556-RS, filed October 29, 2012 (the "Cassiman Action"); (ii) Vanderschaaf v. Petersen, et al., No. C-12-06058-RS, filed November 29, 2012 (the "Vanderschaaf Action"); and (iii) Morton v. Schmitt, et al., No. C-12-06343-RS, filed December 14, 2012 (the "Morton Action" and, collectively, the "Related Actions").
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer