Hargrove v. City of Bakersfield, 1:17-cv-01743-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181102h23
Visitors: 22
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW OF RECORDS OF ALIA CORP. (McDONALD'S) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . At the informal conference re: discovery dispute (Doc. 23), the parties agreed the Court would conduct an in camera review of educational and employment records of the plaintiff. The Court has received and reviewed the records from Alia Corp which operates the McDonald's where the plaintiff has been employed. The Court finds the records to be discoverable, though they should be redac
Summary: ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW OF RECORDS OF ALIA CORP. (McDONALD'S) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . At the informal conference re: discovery dispute (Doc. 23), the parties agreed the Court would conduct an in camera review of educational and employment records of the plaintiff. The Court has received and reviewed the records from Alia Corp which operates the McDonald's where the plaintiff has been employed. The Court finds the records to be discoverable, though they should be redact..
More
ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW OF RECORDS OF ALIA CORP. (McDONALD'S)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
At the informal conference re: discovery dispute (Doc. 23), the parties agreed the Court would conduct an in camera review of educational and employment records of the plaintiff. The Court has received and reviewed the records from Alia Corp which operates the McDonald's where the plaintiff has been employed. The Court finds the records to be discoverable, though they should be redacted to delete at least the first five digits of the plaintiff's social security number. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. All of the records from Alia Corp/McDonald's SHALL be produced to the defendants within five court days and SHALL include a declaration from the custodian of records. The plaintiff may require before production, that at least the first five digits of the plaintiff's social security number is redacted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
