Yoachim v. Pizza Hut, LLC., 2:17-cv-01675-MJP. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180117d62
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURES MARSHA J. PECHMAN , District Judge . Defendant Pizza Hut, LLC ("Pizza Hut"), 1 by and through its undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7(j), moves this Court for an extension of time for the parties to exchange initial disclosures in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). Pizza Hut makes this request because it needs additional time to prepare
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURES MARSHA J. PECHMAN , District Judge . Defendant Pizza Hut, LLC ("Pizza Hut"), 1 by and through its undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7(j), moves this Court for an extension of time for the parties to exchange initial disclosures in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). Pizza Hut makes this request because it needs additional time to prepare i..
More
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURES
MARSHA J. PECHMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Pizza Hut, LLC ("Pizza Hut"),1 by and through its undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7(j), moves this Court for an extension of time for the parties to exchange initial disclosures in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). Pizza Hut makes this request because it needs additional time to prepare its disclosures. Pizza Hut has conferred with Plaintiffs regarding this Motion, and Plaintiffs have confirmed that they do not oppose the Motion.
THEREFORE, Pizza Hut respectfully requests that the Court grant this unopposed Motion and give the parties until January 30, 2018 to exchange initial disclosures in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The parties have stipulated to substitute Pizza Hut as Defendant. (Dkt. #21, p. 1.)
Source: Leagle
