TAYLOR v. HARRINGTON, CV 10-5280 JST (MRW). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120423555
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPHINE S. TUCKER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge with the sole correction of a typog
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPHINE S. TUCKER, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge with the sole correction of a typogr..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOSEPHINE S. TUCKER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge with the sole correction of a typographical error on page 6, line 16 so that the sentence reads "There is no basis. . . ."
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
