Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DYNATRACE LLC v. RAMEY, 3:16-cv-01777-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160718891 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: [ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) [X] Private ADR (specify process and provider): Mediation with JAMS in San Francisco Bay Area The parties
More

STIPULATION AND[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) [X] Private ADR (specify process and provider): Mediation with JAMS in San Francisco Bay Area

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[ ] the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) [X] other requested deadline: November 18, 2106

ORDER

Having read and considered the foregoing Stipulation of the parties submitted herewith and for good cause shown, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION:

[X] IT IS SO ORDERED

[ ] IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer