Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alfasigma USA, Inc. v. First Databank, Inc., 4:18-cv-06924-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190206a61 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT FIRST DATABANK, INC. TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF ALFASIGMA USA, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE, MOTION TO DISMISS, AND MOTION TO STRIKE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), who through their undersigned counsel respectfully request the Court to enlarge the time for Defendant First Databank, Inc. ("First Databank") t
More

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT FIRST DATABANK, INC. TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF ALFASIGMA USA, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE, MOTION TO DISMISS, AND MOTION TO STRIKE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), who through their undersigned counsel respectfully request the Court to enlarge the time for Defendant First Databank, Inc. ("First Databank") to reply to Plaintiff Alfasigma USA, Inc. ("Plaintiff")'s Opposition to Defendant's Special Motion to Strike, Motion to Dismiss, and Motion to Strike (ECF No. 26) by fourteen (14) days, up to and including February 22, 2019. The parties declare in support of this request:

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed its Complaint (ECF No. 1).

WHEREAS, on December 11, 2018, Plaintiff and First Databank stipulated that the time for First Databank to file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint was extended from December 12, 2018 to December 21, 2018 (ECF No. 14).

WHEREAS, on January 2, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Stipulation and Declaration Extending Time for Plaintiff to Respond to First Databank's Motion to Strike from January 4, 2019 to February 1, 2019 (ECF No. 19), which was so-ordered by the Court (ECF No. 20).

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Opposition to First Databank's Motion to Strike on February 1, 2019 (ECF No. 26).

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(c), First Databank's reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Strike is due within seven (7) days after the opposition was filed. First Databank's reply is currently due on February 8, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to Court approval, that First Databank's reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Strike shall be filed on or before February 5, 2019 Respectfully submitted,

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Stipulation. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatories have concurred in this filing.

Dated: February 4, 2019 By: /s/Ravi V. Sitwala Ravi V. Sitwala Attorney for Defendant First Databank, Inc.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer