U.S. v. PRATT, 2:01-cr-0152 WBS AC (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160907916
Visitors: 31
Filed: Sep. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . The court entered its Order of June 6, 2016 (Docket No. 42) pursuant to the suggestion of the Court of Appeals in this matter (Docket No. 41). Because the parties now request that this court ignore that suggestion and set aside its previous order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's June 2, 2016 Order staying the case (ECF No. 42) is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government shall have 60 days to file a response to Petitioner's motion
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . The court entered its Order of June 6, 2016 (Docket No. 42) pursuant to the suggestion of the Court of Appeals in this matter (Docket No. 41). Because the parties now request that this court ignore that suggestion and set aside its previous order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's June 2, 2016 Order staying the case (ECF No. 42) is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government shall have 60 days to file a response to Petitioner's motion ..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
The court entered its Order of June 6, 2016 (Docket No. 42) pursuant to the suggestion of the Court of Appeals in this matter (Docket No. 41). Because the parties now request that this court ignore that suggestion and set aside its previous order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's June 2, 2016 Order staying the case (ECF No. 42) is VACATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government shall have 60 days to file a response to Petitioner's motion (ECF No. 35.) From the date of the Government's filing, Movant-Defendant shall have 30 days to file a reply.
Source: Leagle
