Watson v. Colvin, 2:16-CV-00438-AC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161220a52
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of December 19, 2016, by twenty-one days, to the
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of December 19, 2016, by twenty-one days, to the n..
More
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of December 19, 2016, by twenty-one days, to the new due date of January 9, 2017, and all other deadlines be extended accordingly. This extension is requested because the writer's office will be closed for the holiday period.
[proposed ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a requested extension of Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED.
Plaintiff shall file his Reply on or before January 9, 2017.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
