JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

THE THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES:

Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST,

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiffs Lauren Carter, Stephanie Cooley, and Jason Green ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Apple, Inc. and Path, Inc. ("Defendants") through their respective counsel, have stipulated to request an Order extending the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' motion for class certification (Dkt. No. 609) based on the following recitals.

WHEREAS, on January 6, 2016, the Court ordered that Plaintiffs' motion for class certification against Defendants Path, Inc. and Apple Inc. be filed on January 8, 2016, Apple and Path's opposition brief be filed on March 3, 2016, and Plaintiffs' reply brief be filed on March 24, 2016, and set a hearing date and time of April 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 602);

WHEREAS, the Court approved Plaintiffs and Defendants' stipulation to continue the deadlines for Apple and Path's oppositions to the pending motion for class certification by 14 days and to continue the deadline for Plaintiffs' reply by 28 days, and set a hearing date of May 31 (Dkt. No. 638);

WHEREAS, on March 8, the parties resolved through negotiation an ongoing discovery issue regarding evidence that Defendants consider relevant to the pending class certification motion;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed in conjunction with that resolution, subject to Court approval, to continue the dates on which Apple and Path's oppositions to the pending motion for class certification are due by 14 days from March 17 to March 31, and to continue the date on which Plaintiffs' reply is due by 14 days from April 21 to May 5;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Apple, and Path request that the Court continue the hearing on Plaintiffs' class certification motion from May 31 to June 14, or such other date convenient for the Court;

WHEREAS, the Parties do not expect to request further extensions or adjustments of the briefing schedule;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants to request that the Court extend the briefing schedule as follows:

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories listed above.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants Apple, Inc. and Path, Inc. ("Defendants") is granted, as follows:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.