Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. PAUL M. ZAGARIS, INC., 3:16-CV-01099-JCS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160422c02 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . Pursuant to the United States District Court, Northern District of California Local Rules, Rule 6-1(a), counsel for Plaintiff Hanover Insurance Company ("Hanover") and counsel for Defendants Paul M. Zagaris, Inc., Jon Paul Zagaris, Karrie Goold, Danielle Hardcastle, Esther Gutierrez, Fred Oshtory, and Michael P. Dutra (collectively "Defendants"), state: The S
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Pursuant to the United States District Court, Northern District of California Local Rules, Rule 6-1(a), counsel for Plaintiff Hanover Insurance Company ("Hanover") and counsel for Defendants Paul M. Zagaris, Inc., Jon Paul Zagaris, Karrie Goold, Danielle Hardcastle, Esther Gutierrez, Fred Oshtory, and Michael P. Dutra (collectively "Defendants"), state:

The Summons and Complaint in this action have been served on the Defendants and a pleading responsive to the Complaint is currently due from Defendants on April 18, 2016.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the respective attorneys for Plaintiff Hanover Insurance Company and Defendants agree to extend the time for Defendants to respond or otherwise plead to the Complaint to and including Monday, May 9, 2016, unless a subsequent order of the Court extends or has the effect of further extending the time for Defendants to respond or otherwise plead to the Compliant.

Current Court ordered event dates or deadlines are not affected by this stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer