ROBERTS v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 2:15-cv-00388-JAD-PAL. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160201803
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT UNDER SEAL [FIRST REQUEST] PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff BRADLEY ROBERTS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant to file a Reply in Support of Its Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal from the current deadli
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT UNDER SEAL [FIRST REQUEST] PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff BRADLEY ROBERTS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant to file a Reply in Support of Its Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal from the current deadlin..
More
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT UNDER SEAL
[FIRST REQUEST]
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff BRADLEY ROBERTS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant to file a Reply in Support of Its Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal from the current deadline of January 14, 2016 up to and including January 21, 2016.
On December 16, 2015 Defendant filed its Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal [Doc. #90] which relates to one exhibit to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment and Countermotion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. #88 and #89]. Plaintiff filed his Opposition to Defendant's Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal on January 4, 2016. [Doc. #94]. The request for a seven-day extension was made by Defense counsel as a heavy caseload over the past week has prevented them from having the requisite time to complete a thorough Reply. Throughout the pendency of this case, Defendant CCSD has accorded Plaintiff reciprocal extensions when necessary. The parties agree and represent to the Court that this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
