Berry v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:19-cv-00640-APG-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20191216b24
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2019
Summary: Order [Docket No. 71] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff's counsel filed declaration of service of a discovery subpoena, along with a copy of that subpoena. Docket No. 71. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. As such, counsel violated these rules. In addition, the subpoena includes Plaintiff's full date of birth without redaction. See
Summary: Order [Docket No. 71] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff's counsel filed declaration of service of a discovery subpoena, along with a copy of that subpoena. Docket No. 71. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. As such, counsel violated these rules. In addition, the subpoena includes Plaintiff's full date of birth without redaction. See ..
More
Order
[Docket No. 71]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff's counsel filed declaration of service of a discovery subpoena, along with a copy of that subpoena. Docket No. 71. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered in this case. As such, counsel violated these rules.
In addition, the subpoena includes Plaintiff's full date of birth without redaction. See Docket No. 71 at 2. In so doing, counsel violated the redaction requirements applicable to this case. See Local Rule IC 6-1(a)(3).
Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the above-referenced document. The Court instructs counsel to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent an order that they do so. The Court further cautions counsel that they must comply with the redaction requirements for personal identifiers moving forward.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
