Prism Technologies LLC v. United States Cellular Corporation, 8:12CV125 (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190719b30
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' responses to the Court's show cause order, Filing Nos. 367 and 368 1 . Plaintiff Prism Technologies LLC ("Prism") is not opposed to dismissal of the above-captioned actions in view of the resolution of appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the related cases of Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., No. 8:12cv123 and Prism Techs. LLC v. T-Mobile U
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. BATAILLON , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' responses to the Court's show cause order, Filing Nos. 367 and 368 1 . Plaintiff Prism Technologies LLC ("Prism") is not opposed to dismissal of the above-captioned actions in view of the resolution of appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the related cases of Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., No. 8:12cv123 and Prism Techs. LLC v. T-Mobile US..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' responses to the Court's show cause order, Filing Nos. 367 and 3681. Plaintiff Prism Technologies LLC ("Prism") is not opposed to dismissal of the above-captioned actions in view of the resolution of appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the related cases of Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., No. 8:12cv123 and Prism Techs. LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 8:12cv124. The defendants respond that the dismissals should be with prejudice. The Court agrees. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that these actions are dismissed, with prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs.
FootNotes
1. Filings refer to those found in 8:12cv125.
Source: Leagle
