Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CLAYTON v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, 1:17-cv-0154 LJO JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170607943 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE (Doc. 9) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have filed as stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The stipulation relies on Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(1) which provides, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.". . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an o
More

ORDER CLOSING CASE

(Doc. 9)

The parties have filed as stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The stipulation relies on Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(1) which provides, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.". . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the stipulation signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer