Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. KAISER, 2:16-cr-054 TLN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160628a87 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Ross Naughton, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Mark W. Kaiser that the status conference scheduled for June 30, 2016 be vacated and continued to August 25, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Ross Naughton, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Mark W. Kaiser that the status conference scheduled for June 30, 2016 be vacated and continued to August 25, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.

The Government has produced pages of documents and made electronic devices and other physical evidence available for review. Defense counsel for Mr. Kaiser requires additional time to review the discovery, to conduct additional investigation and legal research, and to confer with his client about how to proceed in this case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded as of June 24, 2016, the date of the parties' stipulation, through and including August 25, 2016; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders from the time of the parties' stipulation, June 24, 2016, up to and including August 25, 2016, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the June 30, 2016 status conference shall be continued until August 25, 2016, at 9:30 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer