Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Todd, 4:18-cr-00003. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20191125a38 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL L. BROWN , District Judge . The Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending denial of Defendant Cody Ryan Todd's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Illegal Search. (Dkts. 391; 831.) Defendant did not file objections to the R&R. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); FED. R. CR
More

ORDER

The Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending denial of Defendant Cody Ryan Todd's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Illegal Search. (Dkts. 391; 831.) Defendant did not file objections to the R&R.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CRIM. P. 59; Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam). For those findings and recommendations to which a party has not asserted objections, a court must conduct a plain error review of the record. United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's R&R and finds no error.

The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 831) and DENIES Defendant Cody Ryan Todd's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Illegal Search (Dkt. 391).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer