I.V. v. Vacaville Unified School District, 2:19-cv-000273-KJM-DB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190605d65
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND JANE SHAMIEH TO ANSWER THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff I.V. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ("District") and JANE SHAMIEH ("Defendants"), pursuant to Local Rules 137, 143, and 144, that Defendants should be granted an extension of time to file an answer to Plaintiff's Fi
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND JANE SHAMIEH TO ANSWER THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff I.V. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ("District") and JANE SHAMIEH ("Defendants"), pursuant to Local Rules 137, 143, and 144, that Defendants should be granted an extension of time to file an answer to Plaintiff's Fir..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND JANE SHAMIEH TO ANSWER THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff I.V. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ("District") and JANE SHAMIEH ("Defendants"), pursuant to Local Rules 137, 143, and 144, that Defendants should be granted an extension of time to file an answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for the following reasons:
Defendants intend to file a Motion to Dismiss to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 15(a)(3), an Answer would be due to be filed concurrently with Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. As such, filing an Answer prior to or concurrently with the Motion to Dismiss could result in a waste of time and resources. No previous extensions of time have been sought.
The parties therefore agree and stipulate that Defendants should be granted an extension to file an Answer to the First Amended Complaint to a period of time to be set forth by the Court in its ruling on the Motion to Dismiss.
Dated May 21, 2019 JOHNSON SCHACHTER & LEWIS
A Professional Law Corporation
/s/ Jason M. Sherman
JASON M. SHERMAN
Dated: May 21, 2019 LIBERTY LAW
/s/ Micha Star Liberty (authorized on May 21,
2019)
MICHA STAR LIBERTY
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Defendants to file an Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended to a period of time to be set forth by the Court in its ruling on the Motion to Dismiss.
Source: Leagle
