Khobragade v. Covidien LP, 16-cv-0468-WQH-AGS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181023898
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO RECONSIDER (ECF No. 100) MARC L. GOLDMAN , Magistrate Judge . On October 4, 2018, Judge Stanley A. Boone denied plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery. ( See ECF No. 93.) On October 9, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider Judge Boone's Order (ECF No. 94), which the Court denied. ( See ECF No. 98.) Plaintiff has now filed a second motion to reconsider reopening discovery. (ECF No. 100.) Plaintiff presents no new evidence that would warrant
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO RECONSIDER (ECF No. 100) MARC L. GOLDMAN , Magistrate Judge . On October 4, 2018, Judge Stanley A. Boone denied plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery. ( See ECF No. 93.) On October 9, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider Judge Boone's Order (ECF No. 94), which the Court denied. ( See ECF No. 98.) Plaintiff has now filed a second motion to reconsider reopening discovery. (ECF No. 100.) Plaintiff presents no new evidence that would warrant ..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO RECONSIDER (ECF No. 100)
MARC L. GOLDMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On October 4, 2018, Judge Stanley A. Boone denied plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery. (See ECF No. 93.) On October 9, 2018, plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider Judge Boone's Order (ECF No. 94), which the Court denied. (See ECF No. 98.) Plaintiff has now filed a second motion to reconsider reopening discovery. (ECF No. 100.) Plaintiff presents no new evidence that would warrant reconsideration. For the reasons stated in this Court's denial of plaintiff's first motion to reconsider (see ECF No. 98), plaintiff's motion is denied. No further motions for reconsideration of plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery (ECF No. 89) will be considered by the magistrate judge.
Source: Leagle
